Refreshing HJ

76561198041665964 Steam ID

1155 hrs CS2 Hours

No VAC Ban

Analyzed by TrackBans AI on 03/27/2026 02:15

AI Cheat Probability

--%

Calculating...

Legit 0% Suspicious 50% Cheating 100%

Model Confidence: --

Evidence & Analysis

AI Analysis Report

Leetify Data: Enhanced analysis using Leetify data.

Multiple Leetify data sources available (4 types) - prediction remains highly reliable despite Steam privacy settings.
Prediction Confidence: Very High based on strong statistical indicators, detailed Leetify gameplay analysis, consistency pattern analysis, comprehensive Steam statistics, recent performance tracking, social network data.
(Probability: 0.15)

I've processed multiple data sources to evaluate this profile. Here's my assessment:

Data Sources:

Steam StatsLeetify AimPositioningConsistencyRecent DataSocial

Supporting Evidence:

Match History: Extensive history of 1020 matches suggests established legitimate play

Natural Variance: Performance fluctuations are within normal human ranges

Clean Network: Social connections show low ban rates typical of legitimate players

Summary:

Risk Assessment: Multiple indicators suggest legitimate gameplay patterns

The evidence strongly supports this being a legitimate player. Consider this analysis as part of a broader assessment when evaluating this player.

This profile has been analyzed 1 time.

Take Action

Review the analysis and decide your next steps.

View on Steam Analyze Another Player

This is a statistical analysis based on public data. Confidence is not 100% accurate. Results should be considered alongside other factors when making decisions.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What does TrackBans say about this player?

Refreshing HJ has been analyzed by our AI. The score is based on 180+ public stats, not gameplay demos.

How many CS2 hours does this profile have?

According to Steam, the account has logged 1155 hours in Counter-Strike 2.

What does the percentage actually mean?

It reflects how closely this account's patterns match those of already-banned users. 0-49% likely legit, 50-79% suspicious, 80-100% high risk.

Can the AI make mistakes?

Yes — statistical models can yield false positives/negatives. If you believe the result is wrong, re-analyse after a few days; fresh data may change the outcome.

How reliable is TrackBans for CS2 cheat detection?

Our AI model achieves 86.29% F1-Score and 93.60% ROC-AUC, trained on 204,000+ profiles.