Logo TrackBans Reducido
β›§π’«π“Žπ“‡π’Άπ“‚π’Άπ“π‘’β­•βƒ€'s avatar

β›§π’«π“Žπ“‡π’Άπ“‚π’Άπ“π‘’β­•βƒ€

76561198041566004 Steam ID
3839 hrs CS2 Hours
No VAC Ban
Analyzed by TrackBans AI on 08/07/2026 22:12
AI Cheat Probability
--%
Calculating...
Legit 0% Suspicious 50% Cheating 100%

AI Analysis Report

FACEIT ELO: 913 · Level 4
Player Analysis
Aim ScoreNORMAL
25/100
-51% avg 52/100 for this ELO range
Headshot %NORMAL
35.7%
-15% avg 42.0% for this ELO range
AccuracyNORMAL
10.5%
-12% avg 11.9% for this ELO range
FACEIT K/DNORMAL
0.93
+7% avg 0.87 for this ELO range
Reaction TimeNORMAL
0.630s
avg: 0.665s for this ELO range
KASTNORMAL
65.1%
avg: 67.9% for this ELO range
HLTV 2.0NORMAL
0.84
avg: 1.05 for this ELO range
Pre-AimNORMAL
9.6
avg: 10.2 for this ELO range
Time to KillNORMAL
1.040s
avg: 0.790s for this ELO range
Opening DuelsNORMAL
51.1%
avg: 48.8% for this ELO range
ADRNORMAL
65.3
avg: 77.4 for this ELO range
Win RateNORMAL
49.4%
avg: 50.7% for this ELO range
AWP AccNORMAL
32.7%
avg: 37.3% for this ELO range
PerformanceELEVATED
61.2
avg: 45.8 for this ELO range
Account TrustNORMAL
64.5
avg: 38.3 for this ELO range
Social RiskNORMAL
26.3
avg: 31.1 for this ELO range
avg for this ELO range
Data sourcesSteam ProfileGames ListStatsLeetifyFACEIT
(Probability: 0.03)

Supporting Evidence:

  • Clean Network: Social connections show low ban rates typical of legitimate players

Take Action

Review the analysis and decide your next steps.

This is a statistical analysis based on public data. Confidence is not 100% accurate. Results should be considered alongside other factors when making decisions.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What does TrackBans say about this player?

β›§π’«π“Žπ“‡π’Άπ“‚π’Άπ“π‘’β­•βƒ€ has been analyzed by our AI. The score is based on 180+ public stats, not gameplay demos.

How many CS2 hours does this profile have?

According to Steam, the account has logged 3839 hours in Counter-Strike 2.

What does the percentage actually mean?

It reflects how closely this account's patterns match those of already-banned users. 0-29% low risk, 30-49% caution, 50-79% suspicious, 80-100% high risk.

Can the AI make mistakes?

Yes β€” statistical models can yield false positives/negatives. If you believe the result is wrong, re-analyse after a few days; fresh data may change the outcome.

How reliable is TrackBans for CS2 cheat detection?

Our AI model achieves 86.29% F1-Score and 93.60% ROC-AUC, trained on 204,000+ profiles.

Scroll al inicio