risker@wrk's avatar

risker@wrk

76561197966418464 Steam ID
3157 hrs CS2 Hours
No VAC Ban
Analyzed by TrackBans AI on 04/14/2026 21:33
AI Cheat Probability
--%
Calculating...
Legit 0% Suspicious 50% Cheating 100%

AI Analysis Report

Leetify Data: This user is not registered on Leetify. Analysis based on Steam data only.
FACEIT Data: Enhanced analysis using FACEIT data | ELO: 857 | Level: 3.
FACEIT ELO: 857 · Level 3
Player Analysis
Aim Score
25.1
-5% avg 26.5
Headshot %
52.3%
+26% avg 41.6%
Accuracy
0.8%
-94% avg 13.1%
FACEIT K/D
0.73
-16% avg 0.87
Win Rate
50.2%
avg: 51.3%
MVP/Round
0.07
avg: 0.14
AWP Acc
35.8%
avg: 37.1%
AK-47 Acc
17.5%
avg: 18.6%
Deagle Acc
25.3%
avg: 25.9%
Performance
61.4
avg: 72.4
Account Trust
39.8
avg: 38.6
Social Risk
40.0
avg: 30.7
FACEIT WR%
43.6%
avg: 43.8%
FACEIT HS%
52.0%
avg: 42.2%
FACEIT Matches
39
Hours
3157
avg: 1029
Data is sufficiently complete for a reliable prediction. ✅
Prediction Confidence: Very High based on strong statistical indicators, comprehensive Steam statistics, social network data.
(Probability: 0.17)

My analysis has revealed several key patterns. Let me break down what I discovered:
Data Sources:
Steam StatsFACEIT ProfileFACEIT StatsFACEIT Maps

Summary:

Risk Assessment: Multiple indicators suggest legitimate gameplay patterns

The evidence strongly supports this being a legitimate player. Remember that this is a statistical analysis and should be considered alongside other factors when making decisions.

This profile has been analyzed 2 times.

Take Action

Review the analysis and decide your next steps.

This is a statistical analysis based on public data. Confidence is not 100% accurate. Results should be considered alongside other factors when making decisions.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What does TrackBans say about this player?

risker@wrk has been analyzed by our AI. The score is based on 180+ public stats, not gameplay demos.

How many CS2 hours does this profile have?

According to Steam, the account has logged 3157 hours in Counter-Strike 2.

What does the percentage actually mean?

It reflects how closely this account's patterns match those of already-banned users. 0-29% low risk, 30-49% caution, 50-79% suspicious, 80-100% high risk.

Can the AI make mistakes?

Yes — statistical models can yield false positives/negatives. If you believe the result is wrong, re-analyse after a few days; fresh data may change the outcome.

How reliable is TrackBans for CS2 cheat detection?

Our AI model achieves 86.29% F1-Score and 93.60% ROC-AUC, trained on 204,000+ profiles.

Scroll al inicio